Titouan Droguet vs Lorenzo Giustino Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• How does the second serve performance compare between the two players? Titouan Droguet shows a stronger performance, winning 46.40% of points, against Lorenzo Giustino's 40.56%.
• In return games, Lorenzo Giustino slightly edges out Titouan Droguet. Giustino has won 47.43% of opponent's second serve points, compared to Droguet's 44.00%.
• Looking at first serve returns, Giustino again has an advantage, winning 27.08% compared to Droguet's 25.24%.
• Both players show similar ability to save breakpoints under pressure, with Droguet at 54.31% and Giustino at 51.66%.
• In terms of overall performance in the past year, Giustino narrowly surpasses Droguet with a 64.84% win rate versus Droguet's 63.64% win rate.
• Both players have their best surface results on clay, with a 68% win rate. Droguet struggles most on indoors hard courts, winning 57%, whereas Giustino has not performed well on grass with no wins.
• What does the event level tell us? Droguet competes mostly in Challengers/ITF > $10K, winning 65.91% of matches, while Giustino excels in Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K with a 77.42% win rate.
• The quality of opponents differs, with Droguet facing higher-ranked players (average rank 233.79) compared to Giustino’s lower-ranked opponents (370.42).
• If the match reaches a deciding set, Droguet holds a slight advantage, having won 59% compared to Giustino’s 55% of all deciding sets played in the last year.
• Factoring current event performance is crucial for accurate predictions, though historical data already indicates potential match outcomes.

Editorial Prediction (November 5, 2025, UTC):

In analyzing the match statistics, both players demonstrate certain strengths. Titouan Droguet has shown a stronger second serve performance, which could be crucial in maintaining pressure during his service games. Meanwhile, Lorenzo Giustino's return game indicates his ability to challenge and break his opponent's service games.

When considering surface preferences, both players perform best on clay, which could make for an even battleground in this match-up. However, the competitive level of opponents previously faced by Droguet suggests he might be more accustomed to higher-pressure situations.

In deciding set scenarios, Droguet again has the upper hand, adding to his slight edge in overall consistency and competitive experience against stronger opponents. Thus, based on current form and relevant strengths, Titouan Droguet appears more likely to emerge as the winner.